Ethical Principles and Legal Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence: Ensuring Fairness and Accountability in AI Governance

Authors

  • Muhidin Universitas Borobudur Author
  • Lu Sudirman Universitas Internasional Batam Author

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Algorithmic bias, AI ethics, Legal responsibility , Fairness by design, AI governance

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents significant ethical and legal challenges, particularly regarding algorithmic bias, opaque decision-making, and the absence of clear liability mechanisms. This study examines how key ethical principles such as transparency, fairness, privacy protection, and accountability can be integrated into a legal responsibility framework to support fair and accountable AI governance. The research uses a normative juridical method with conceptual, statutory, and case approaches to assess the limitations of traditional liability models when applied to autonomous systems. The findings indicate that algorithmic bias can lead to both material and procedural injustice, while gaps in regulation create uncertainty about who should bear responsibility for AI-related harm. This study recommends the application of fairness by design, mandatory model documentation, algorithmic audits, and shared responsibility among developers, operators, and users. These findings highlight the need for adaptive regulation to ensure that the use of AI upholds justice, protects individual rights, and serves the public interest.

References

Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: Risk assessments in criminal sentencing. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

Australian Human Rights Commission. (2020). Addressing the problem of algorithmic bias. Australian Human Rights Commission. https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/ final_version_technical_paper_addressing_the_problem_of_algorithmic_bias.pdf

Bharati, R. (2025). Bias and fairness in AI algorithms: Legal standards and ethical guidelines. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5378211

Chen, Z. (2023). Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41599-023-02079-x

Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK0AH

European Parliament & Council. (2024). Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206

Hanna, M. G. (2025). Ethical and bias considerations in artificial intelligence and machine learning in the medical domain. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0893395224002667

Hidayati, S. (2024). Civil liability for clients who suffer losses in using artificial intelligence services. Jurnal Lex Publica, 7(1), 101–112. https://dinastires.org/JLPH/article/download/894/844

International Journal for Legal Studies. (2025). Legal accountability of algorithmic bias: Examining the role of enforcement and transparency. International Journal for Legal Studies. https://international.appihi.or.id/index.php/IJLS/article/view/521

Lendvai, K., & Gosztonyi, G. (2025). Algorithmic bias as a core legal dilemma in the age of artificial intelligence: Conceptual basis and the current state of regulation. Laws, 14(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14030041

Min, A., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and bias: Challenges, issues and regulatory perspectives. International Journal for Scientific Research. https://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ ijsr/article/download/1477/976

Munifah, D., Komariah, E., & Muchlis, A. (2024). Ethical challenges in AI-driven decision-making: Addressing bias and accountability in business applications. Jurnal Manajemen Informatika, 15(1), 45–53. https://jmi.stekom.ac.id/index.php/jmi/article/view/48

Pfeiffer, M. J. (2023). First, do no harm: Algorithms, AI, and digital product liability. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10861

Wachter, S. (2022). The theory of artificial immutability: Protecting algorithmic groups under anti-discrimination law. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01166

Xiang, A. (2021). Reconciling legal and technical approaches to algorithmic bias. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3650635

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25