Legal Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Utilization in The Formation of Authentic Deeds Under Indonesian Notarial Law
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Authentic deeds, Notary authority, Notarial law, Cyber notary, Legal validityAbstract
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) had introduced new forms of automation into legal services, including notarial practice. This research examined the extent to which AI could be utilized in the formation of authentic deeds without violating the formal requirements stipulated under Indonesian law. Using a normative legal research methodology supported by a statute and conceptual approach, this study analyzed the Civil Code, the Notary Office Law, and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, alongside recent scholarly literature. The findings showed that AI had no legal standing as a public official, could not verify the legal capacity or free will of the parties, and could not fulfill mandatory procedural requirements such as physical presence, reading of the deed, and witnessing. AI was therefore limited to administrative and analytical support, including drafting templates, conducting legal research, and managing electronic documents. The study concluded that the use of AI in creating authentic deeds remained legally impermissible, as the validity of such deeds depended on human supervision and direct involvement of a notary as mandated by statutory provisions.
References
Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Adjie, H. (2009). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris. Refika Aditama.
Civil Code of Indonesia (Burgerlijk Wetboek). (n.d.).
European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). European Union.
Habib Adjie. (2017). Akta Notaris sebagai Akta Autentik. Refika Aditama.
Kartika, D. (2022). Electronic evidence and its implications for Indonesian civil procedure. Indonesian Journal of Law and Technology, 3(1), 12–25.
Kuner, C. (2017). Data Protection Law and International Dispute Resolution. Oxford University Press.
Law No. 1 of 2024 on Amendments to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (Indonesia).
Law No. 2 of 2014 on Amendments to the Notary Office Law (Indonesia).
Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (Indonesia).
Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Notary Office (Indonesia).
Mason, S., & Seng, D. (Eds.). (2020). Electronic Evidence (4th ed.). LexisNexis.
OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Publishing.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Siregar, M. (2020). The role of authenticity in Indonesian notarial deeds. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(2), 345–364.
Situmorang, J. (2019). Legal responsibility of notaries in the digital era. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(4), 715–735.
Suratman, & Philips, E. (2015). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). (2017). Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records. UN Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Widya Wahyu Utami, Ratih Agustin Wulandari (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










