Reconstructing the Application of Denda Damai (Settlement-by-Fine Mechanism) in Corruption Cases: A Socio-Legal and Cultural Perspective in Indonesia
Keywords:
Attorney General’s Office, corruption, restorative justice, settlement fine, socio-legal approachAbstract
The growing discourse on the application of denda damai (settlement-by-fine mechanism) as an alternative approach to corruption cases reflected a shifting orientation in Indonesian law enforcement from retributive punishment toward administrative efficiency and restorative considerations. This study employed a normative legal method supported by a socio-legal perspective to evaluate whether this mechanism could be normatively justified and socially accepted when applied to corruption, which is legally classified as an extraordinary crime. The analysis showed that, although the settlement-by-fine mechanism offered potential administrative efficiency and faster recovery of state losses, it conflicted with the Anti-Corruption Law, which explicitly stated that restitution did not eliminate criminal liability. The findings also demonstrated strong public resistance rooted in cultural expectations of punitive justice toward corruption offenders. This study concluded that any policy reform in this area required normative consistency, procedural safeguards, and cultural legitimacy to align restorative aspirations with Indonesia’s prevailing legal and social values.
References
Aulia, F., Rahmattullah, R., & Malikussaleh, M. (2025). Penghentian penyidikan perkara tindak pidana korupsi oleh kejaksaan terhadap pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara. Jurnal Suloh: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 13(1), 44–56.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Indonesian law. Oxford University Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Hamzah, A. (2017). Kejahatan di bidang ekonomi (Economic crimes). Sinar Grafika.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2023). Annual corruption trends report 2019–2023. ICW Publications.
Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.
Legal Information Centre of the Attorney General’s Office. (2024). Annual statistical report on corruption cases. Kejaksaan Agung RI.
Lindsey, T., & Dick, H. (2002). Corruption in Asia: Rethinking the governance paradigm. The Federation Press.
Saptomo, A. (2010). Hukum dan kearifan lokal: Revitalisasi hukum adat sebagai sumber hukum dalam sistem hukum nasional. LaksBang Mediatama.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001.
Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adi Setya Desta Landya, Aida Dewi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
